Qualität und Sicherheit in der Gesundheitsversorgung / Quality and Safety in Health Care| Volume 137, P20-26, November 01, 2018

Methods to detect inappropriate use of MRI and CT for musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review

Published:November 06, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2018.09.002

      Abstract

      Objective

      Identify and evaluate methods suitable for detecting inappropriate use of MRI or CT in the musculoskeletal system.

      Design

      Systematic review of studies that described methods to measure inappropriate use of MRI or CT in the musculoskeletal system. We used a multi-step strategy to classify identified methods into categories. These categories were then analyzed according to the data needed and their limitations.

      Eligibility criteria for selecting studies

      English or German language studies that measured inappropriate use of MRI or CT in the musculoskeletal system. Articles were also included if they reported a general approach to the measurement of inappropriate imaging regardless of body region. Expert opinions, unsystematic reviews, commentaries, articles without abstracts, and studies on cancer were excluded.

      Results

      47 studies met the inclusion criteria. The categorization of the studies resulted in seven individual approaches to measure inappropriate use: (1) availability of meaningful diagnostic information; (2) predictors associated with imaging use; (3) comparison with guideline recommendations; (4) assessment by experts; (5) comparison or analysis of patients’ paths; (6) comparison with surgery findings; (7) geographic variation. All these approaches have specific data requirements and individual advantages and disadvantages regarding risk of bias and needed data.

      Conclusions

      We could not find a single method of choice to detect inappropriate use of MRI or CT in the musculoskeletal system. A combination of different approaches is the preferred strategy to deal with the advantages and disadvantages of the individual methods.

      Zusammenfassung

      Ziel

      Identifikation und Evaluation von Methoden zur Feststellung von unangemessener MRT- oder CT-Nutzung im Muskel-Skelett-System.

      Design

      Systematische Übersichtsarbeit von Studien, die Methoden zur Feststellung von unangemessener MRT- oder CT-Nutzung beschrieben haben. Studien wurden in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren ausgewählt und strukturiert. Methodenkategorien wurden anhand der benötigten Daten und ihrer Limitationen analysiert.

      Auswahlkriterien für Studien

      Englisch- oder deutschsprachige Artikel, die unangemessene CT- oder MRT-Nutzung im Muskel-Skelett-System gemessen haben. Studien wurden auch eingeschlossen, wenn ein allgemeiner Ansatz, unabhängig von der Körperregion, beschrieben wurde. Expertenmeinungen, unsystematische Reviews, Kommentare, Artikel ohne Abstract und Studien mit Schwerpunkt Krebs wurden ausgeschlossen.

      Ergebnisse

      47 Studien erfüllten die Einschlusskriterien. Die Kategorisierung der Methoden ergab 7 verschiedene Ansätze: (1) Verwendbare diagnostische Information; (2) Prädiktoren in Verbindung mit der Nutzung bildgebender Verfahren; (3) Vergleich mit Leitlinienempfehlungen; (4) Expertenurteile; (5) Vergleiche oder Analyse verschiedener Behandlungsverläufe; (6) Vergleich mit Operationsbefunden; (7) Regionale Unterschiede. Alle Ansätze waren mit individuellen Vorteilen und Schwächen verbunden und wiesen bestimmte Anforderungen an die Daten auf.

      Schlussfolgerungen

      Wir konnten keine einzelne Methode der Wahl zur Identifikation von unangemessener MRT- oder CT-Nutzung im Muskel-Skelett-System finden. Eine Kombination unterschiedlicher Verfahren kann Nachteile der einzelnen Methoden ausgleichen und Vorteile kombinieren.

      Keywords

      Schlüsselwörter

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

      1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Computed tomography (CT) exams (indicator). 2017; https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/computed-tomography-ct-exams.htm, 11.1.2017.

      2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams (indicator). 2017; https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri-exams.htm#indicator-chart, 11.1.2017.

        • Brownlee S.
        • Chalkidou K.
        • Doust J.
        • et al.
        Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.
        The Lancet. 2017;
        • Mathews J.D.
        • Forsythe A.V.
        • Brady Z.
        • et al.
        Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.
        BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2013; : 346
        • Amrhein T.J.
        • Paxton B.E.
        • Lungren M.P.
        • et al.
        Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric.
        AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. Dec 2014; 35: 2248-2253
        • Babbel D.
        • Rayan G.
        Magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating workers’ compensation patients.
        The Journal of hand surgery. Apr 2012; 37: 811-815
        • Kim J.S.
        • Dong J.Z.
        • Brener S.
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness analysis of a reduction in diagnostic imaging in degenerative spinal disorders.
        Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante. Nov 2011; 7: e105-e121
        • Ibrahim A.W.
        • Magbool G.
        • El-Hassen A.Y.
        • et al.
        The use and misuse of the CT scan of the brain.
        Annals of Saudi medicine. Mar 1992; 12: 166-169
        • Jame S.Z.
        • Majdzadeh R.
        • Sari A.A.
        • et al.
        Indications and overuse of computed tomography in minor head trauma.
        Iranian Red Crescent medical journal. May 2014; 16: e13067
        • Kovacs F.M.
        • Arana E.
        • Royuela A.
        • et al.
        Appropriateness of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in Spain.
        European journal of radiology. Jun 2013; 82: 1008-1014
        • Lee C.I.
        • Ponce N.A.
        • Ettner S.L.
        • et al.
        Ordering of CT by emergency department provider type: analysis of a nationally representative sample.
        AJR. American journal of roentgenology. Nov 2012; 199: 1054-1059
        • Jame S.Z.
        • Sari A.A.
        • Majdzadeh R.
        • et al.
        The extent of inappropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging in low back pain and its contributory factors.
        International journal of preventive medicine. Aug 2014; 5: 1029-1036
        • Mathias J.S.
        • Feinglass J.
        • Baker D.W.
        Variations in US hospital performance on imaging-use measures.
        Medical care. Sep 2012; 50: 808-814
        • Levine M.B.
        • Moore A.B.
        • Franck C.
        • et al.
        Variation in use of all types of computed tomography by emergency physicians.
        The American journal of emergency medicine. Oct 2013; 31: 1437-1442
        • Vance E.A.
        • Xie X.
        • Henry A.
        • et al.
        Computed tomography scan use variation: patient, hospital, and geographic factors.
        The American journal of managed care. 2013; 19: e93-e99
        • Pham H.H.
        • Landon B.E.
        • Reschovsky J.D.
        • et al.
        Rapidity and modality of imaging for acute low back pain in elderly patients.
        Archives of internal medicine. May 25 2009; 169: 972-981
        • Swedlow A.
        • Johnson G.
        • Smithline N.
        • et al.
        Increased costs and rates of use in the California workers’ compensation system as a result of self-referral by physicians.
        The New England journal of medicine. Nov 19 1992; 327: 1502-1506
      3. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. 2001; http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2011/MR1269.pdf, 26.8.2016.

        • Schroth W.S.
        • Schectman J.M.
        • Elinsky E.G.
        • et al.
        Utilization of medical services for the treatment of acute low back pain: conformance with clinical guidelines.
        Journal of general internal medicine. Sep-Oct 1992; 7: 486-491
        • Linder R.
        • Horenkamp-Sonntag D.
        • Engel S.
        • et al.
        Quality Assurance using routine data: Overdiagnosis by radiological imaging for back pain.
        Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). May 2016; 141: e96-e103
        • Schwartz A.L.
        • Landon B.E.
        • Elshaug A.G.
        • et al.
        Measuring low-value care in Medicare.
        JAMA internal medicine. Jul 2014; 174: 1067-1076
        • Oikarinen H.
        • Karttunen A.
        • Pääkkö E.
        • et al.
        Survey of inappropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging.
        Insights into Imaging. 2013; 4: 729-733
        • Butler G.J.
        • Stolberg H.O.
        The use of cross-sectional diagnostic imaging in a major Canadian health care centre.
        Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l’Association canadienne des radiologistes. Jun 2004; 55: 174-177
        • Tocci S.L.
        • Madom I.A.
        • Bradley M.P.
        • et al.
        The diagnostic value of MRI in foot and ankle surgery.
        Foot & ankle international. Feb 2007; 28: 166-168
        • Wilson R.J.
        • Zumsteg J.W.
        • Hartley K.A.
        • et al.
        Overutilization and Cost of Advanced Imaging for Long-Bone Cartilaginous Lesions.
        Annals of surgical oncology. Oct 2015; 22: 3466-3473
        • Bradley M.P.
        • Tung G.
        • Green A.
        Overutilization of shoulder magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic screening tool in patients with chronic shoulder pain.
        Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. May-Jun 2005; 14: 233-237
        • Chwals W.J.
        • Robinson A.V.
        • Sivit C.J.
        • et al.
        Computed tomography before transfer to a level I pediatric trauma center risks duplication with associated increased radiation exposure.
        Journal of pediatric surgery. Dec 2008; 43: 2268-2272
        • Sheehan S.E.
        • Coburn J.A.
        • Singh H.
        • et al.
        Reducing Unnecessary Shoulder MRI Examinations Within a Capitated Health Care System: A Potential Role for Shoulder Ultrasound.
        Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR. Jul 2016; 13: 780-787
        • Gelb H.J.
        • Glasgow S.G.
        • Sapega A.A.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of knee disorders. Clinical value and cost-effectiveness in a sports medicine practice.
        The American journal of sports medicine. Jan-Feb 1996; 24: 99-103
      4. NHS England, Public Health England, RightCare. The NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare2011.

      5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Geographic Variations in Health Care: OECD Publishing; 2014.

        • Keyhani S.
        • Falk R.
        • Bishop T.
        • et al.
        The relationship between geographic variations and overuse of healthcare services: a systematic review.
        Medical care. Mar 2012; 50: 257-261
        • Parma C.
        • Carney D.
        • Grim R.
        • et al.
        Unnecessary head computed tomography scans: a level 1 trauma teaching experience.
        The American surgeon. Jul 2014; 80: 664-668