Advertisement
Schwerpunkt| Volume 108, ISSUE 7, P405-412, 2014

Download started.

Ok

How health economic evaluation (HEE) contributes to decision-making in public health care: the case of Brazil

      Summary

      The universal access to a health care system for the Brazilian population was established in 1990. Brazil is a country with no tradition in the production and use of health economic evaluation (HEE) to guide decision making in the public health system. It is only within the last two decades that HEEs using a microeconomic approach have appeared in the academic field. On a national level, HEE and Health Technology Assessment (HTA), in a wider sense, were first taken into account in 2003. Two policies deserve to be mentioned – (i) the regulation of medicines in the Brazilian market, and (ii) science, technology and innovation policy. The latter required the fostering of applied research to encourage the application of methods which employ systematic reviews and economic analyses of cost-effectiveness to guide the incorporation of technologies in the Brazilian health care system. The Ministry of Health has initiated the process of incorporating these new technologies on a federal level during the last ten years. In spite of the improvement of HEE methods at Brazilian universities and research institutes, these technologies have not yet reached the governmental bodies. In Brazil, the main challenge lies in the production, interpretation and application of HEE to all technologies within the access scheme(s), and there is limited capacity building. Setting priorities can be the solution for Brazil to be able to perform HEE for relevant technologies within the access scheme(s) while the universal coverage system struggles with a triple burden of disease.

      Zusammenfassung

      1990 wurde der Zugang zu einer allgemeinen Gesundheitsversorgung für alle Brasilanerinnen und Brasilianer gesetzlich eingeführt. Dabei hatte Brasilien keine Tradition, auf die es bei der Durchführung und Nutzung von Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen in der Entscheidungsfindung im öffentlichen Gesundheitswesen zurückgreifen konnte. Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen haben erst in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten Einzug in den akademischen Bereich gehalten. Im staatlichen Sektor hat man 2003 begonnen, gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation und Health Technology Assessment (HTA) im weiteren Sinne zu berücksichtigen. Insbesondere zwei Maßnahmen sind zu erwähnen: 1) Regulierung von Arzneimitteln im brasilianischen Markt und 2) die übergreifende Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. Letztere hat dazu geführt, dass die Forschung zur Anwendung von systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten und Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen intensiviert wurde, um auf deren Grundlage Entscheidungen über die Erstattung im brasilianischen Gesundheitssystem zu fällen. In den letzten 10 Jahren hat auch das Gesundheitsministerium darauf hingewirkt, HTA und insbesondere Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen im Erstattungsprozess auf nationaler Ebene zu etablieren. Obwohl man sich an den Universitäten und Forschungsinstituten verstärkt mit den Methoden der Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertung beschäftigt, mangelt es in den Behörden und eigentlichen Zentren der Entscheidungsfindung an Experten auf diesem Gebiet. Daher liegt die große Herausforderung darin, trotz der nicht vorhandenen personellen Ausstattung Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen zu erstellen, zu verstehen und für Entscheidungen in der öffentlichen Gesundheitsversorgung anzuwenden. Hilfreich dafür kann es sein, Kosten-Nutzen-Bewertungen für die wirklich im System relevanten Gesundheitstechnologien prioritär durchzuführen, denn angesichts der Krankheitslast kämpft das System mit der finanziellen Nachhaltigkeit.

      Keywords

      Schlüsselwörter

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • World Health Organization
        The world health report: health systems financing: the path to universal coverage.
        WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland2010 (Available:)
        • Jairnilson Paim
        • Claudia Travassos
        • Celia Almeida
        • Ligia Bahia
        • Macinko J.
        O sistema de saúde brasileiro: história, avanços e desafios.
        The Lancet. 2011; 377: 11-31
        • Olsen I.T.
        Sustainability of health care: a framework for analysis.
        Health Policy Plan. 1998; 13: 287-295
        • Schramm J.A.
        • Oliveira A.F.
        • Leite I.
        • Valente J.G.
        • Gadelha ÂMJ
        • Portela M.C.
        • et al.
        Transição epidemiológica e o estudo de carga de doença no Brasil.
        Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2004; 9: 897-908
        • Pacheco Santos L.
        • Moura E.
        • Barradas Barata R.
        • Serruya S.
        • da Motta M.
        • Silva Elias F.
        • et al.
        Fulfillment of the Brazilian Agenda of Priorities in Health Research.
        Health Research Policy and Systems. 2011; 9: 35
        • Guimaraes R.
        • Santos L.M.
        • Angulo-Tuesta A.
        • Serruya S.J.
        Defining and implementing a national policy for science, technology, and innovation in health: lessons from the Brazilian experience.
        Cad Saude Publica. 2006; 22 (discussion 86-94): 1775-1785
      1. Presidência da República, (Republic of Brazil). Lei N° 10.973, de 02 de dezembro de 2004, Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. [online]. Available: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm, accessed: 09.07.2014.

      2. Presidência da República, (Republic of Brazil). Lei N° 10.742, de 6 de outubro de 2003 Define normas de regulação para o setor farmacêutico, cria a Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos - CMED e altera a Lei no 6.360, de 23 de setembro de 1976, e dá outras providências. [online]. Available: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2003/L10.742.htm, accessed: 09.07.2014.

        • Banta D.
        • Almeida R.T.
        The development of health technology assessment in Brazil.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25: 255-259
        • Silva H.P.
        • Petramale C.A.
        • Elias F.T.
        [Advances and challenges to the Brazilian policy of health technology management].
        Rev Saude Publica. 2012; 46: 83-90
      3. Sistema de Legislação da Saúde, (Ministry of Health - Brazil). Portaria N° 2.690, de 5 de novembro de 2009, Institui, no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), a Política Nacional de Gestão de Tecnologias em Saúde. [online]. Available: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2009/prt2690_05_11_2009.html, accessed: 09.07.2014.

        • Gertner A.
        Health technology assessment and incorporation in Brazil: critical reflections on an emerging public-private field.
        J Bras Econ Saude. 2009; 2: 57-59
      4. Sistema de Legislação da Saúde, (Ministry of Health - Brazil). Portaria N° 2.915, de 12 de dezembro de 2011, Institui a Rede Brasileira de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde (REBRATS). [online]. Available: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt2915_12_12_2011.html, accessed: 09.07.2014.

      5. Presidência da República, (Republic of Brazil). Lei N° 12.401, de 28 de abril de 2011, Altera a Lei no 8.080, de 19 de setembro de 1990, para dispor sobre a assistência terapêutica e a incorporação de tecnologia em saúde no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS. [online]. Available: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2011/Lei/L12401.htm, accessed: 09.07.2014.

      6. Presidência da República, (Republic of Brazil). Decreto N° 7.646, de 21 de dezembro de 2011, Dispõe sobre a Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde e sobre o processo administrativo para incorporação, exclusão e alteração de tecnologias em saúde pelo Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS, e dá outras providências. [online]. Available: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2011/Decreto/D7646.htm, accessed: 09.07.2014.

        • Gadelha C.A.G.
        O complexo industrial da saúde e a necessidade de um enfoque dinâmico na economia da saúde.
        Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2003; 8: 21-35
      7. Secretaria de Ciência TeIE, (Brazilian Network for Health Technology Assessment). Diretrizes metodológicas: análise de impacto orçamentário: manual para o Sistema de Saúde do Brasil (Methodological Guidelines: Analysis of the Budget Impact.). Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012. Available: http://200.214.130.94/rebrats/publicacoes/AVALIACAOECONOMICA.pdf, accessed: 05.03.2014.

      8. Health BMo. Estudos de Avaliação Econômica de Tecnologias em Saúde [online]. Available: http://200.214.130.94/rebrats/diretriz.php, accessed: 09.07.2014.

        • Machado M.
        The use of QALYs in health care decision making in Brazil.
        The ISPOR Latin America Consortium Newsletter. 2013; 1
        • Augustovski F.
        • Diaz Rojas J.A.
        • Ferraz M.B.
        • Hernandez I.C.
        • Korenblat Donato B.M.
        • Raimundo K.
        • et al.
        Status update of the reimbursement review environment in the public sector across four Latin American countries.
        Value in Health Regional Issues. 2012; 1: 223-227
        • Viejo I.
        New times for health technology assessment in Brazil's public healthcare system.
        Global Forum Inform. 2013; 4: 1-6
      9. Wilsdon T, Fiz E, Haderi A. A comparative analysis of the role and impact of Health Technology Assessment [online]. 05.2014. Available: http://www.efpia.eu/uploads/documents/cra-comparative-analysis.pdf, accessed: 27.08.2014.

      10. Genenz K, Dominguez A, Alencar R. Unlocking the Key to Public Funding in Brazil [online]. 01.06.2013. Available: http://www.pharmexec.com/pharmexec/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=816162&sk=&date=&pageID=4, accessed: 27.08.2014.

        • Novaes H.M.D.
        • Elias F.T.S.
        Uso da avaliação de tecnologias em saúde em processos de análise para incorporação de tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde no Ministério da Saúde, (Use of health technology assessment in decision-making processes by the Brazilian Ministry of Health on the incorporation of technologies in the Brazilian Unified National Health System) [in portuguese].
        Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2013; 29: 7-16
        • Decimoni T.C.
        • Leandro R.
        • Soarez P.
        D C. Systematic review of economic evaluation of health technologies developed in Brazil from 1980-2013.
        Amsterdam, The Netherlands2014 (ISPOR 17th Annual European Congress to be held 8-12 November 2014 at the Amsterdam RAI.). URL:
      11. Departamento de Economia da Saúde, Investimentos e Desenvolvimento, (Economic department of Saúde IaD. Núcleos de Economia da Saúde, Orientações para implantação. Brazil: Ministério da Saúde,; 2012. Available: http://bases.bireme.br/cgi-bin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xis&src=google&base=LILACS&lang=p&nextAction=lnk&exprSearch=688269&indexSearch=ID.

        • Kuchenbecker R.
        • Polanczyk C.A.
        Institutionalizing health technology assessment in Brazil: challenges ahead.
        Value in Health Regional Issues. 2012; 1: 257-261