Advertisement
Editorial| Volume 106, ISSUE 4, P235-237, 2012

Download started.

Ok

No EBM without SDM: Give us a measure to capture patient involvement and we will move the health system

      Evidence based medicine (EBM) is a practice based not only on the consideration of best research evidence but also on clinical expertise and patient values [
      • Jenicek M.
      Evidence-based medicine: fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review?.
      ]. It therefore stands to reason that medical care without the systematic involvement of patients can no sooner be called EBM than can medical care that fails to consider systematic evaluation of the research evidence [
      • Haynes R.B.
      • Devereaux P.J.
      • Guyatt G.H.
      Physicians’ and patients’ choices in evidence based practice.
      ].
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Literatur

        • Jenicek M.
        Evidence-based medicine: fifteen years later. Golem the good, the bad, and the ugly in need of a review?.
        Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2006; 12: RA241-RA251
        • Haynes R.B.
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Guyatt G.H.
        Physicians’ and patients’ choices in evidence based practice.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 1350
        • Mühlhauser I.
        • Meyer g
        • Steckelberg A.
        Patienten wollen mitentscheiden, doch die Informationsbasis und Strukturen fehlen.
        in: Berger B. Raum für Eigensinn - Ergebnisse eines Expertentreffens zur Patientenkompetenz. KVC-Verlag, Essen2011
        • Schoen C.
        • Osborn R.
        • How S.K.
        • Doty M.M.
        • Peugh J.
        In chronic condition: experiences of patients with complex health care needs, in eight countries, 2008.
        Health affairs. 2009; 28: w1-w16
        • Wegwarth O.
        • Gigerenzer G.
        “There is nothing to worry about”: gynecologists’ counseling on mammography.
        Patient education and counseling. 2011; 84: 251-256
        • Elwyn G.
        • O’Connor A.M.
        • Bennett C.
        • Newcombe R.G.
        • Politi M.
        • Durand M.A.
        • et al.
        Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).
        PLoS One. 2009; 4: e4705
        • Scholl I.
        • Koelewijn-van Loon M.
        • Sepucha K.
        • Elwyn G.
        • Legare F.
        • Harter M.
        • et al.
        Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.
        Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2011; 105: 313-324
        • Elwyn G.
        • Hutchings H.
        • Edwards A.
        • Rapport F.
        • Wensing M.
        • Cheung W.Y.
        • et al.
        The OPTION-scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks.
        Health Expect. 2005; 8: 34-42