Schwerpunkt| Volume 106, ISSUE 4, P272-274, 2012

Download started.


Short Communication: Where is SDM at home? Putting theoretical constraints on the way shared decision making is measured

  • Daniel Wollschläger
    Correspondence to: Daniel Wollschläger, Institut für Psychologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstr. 62, 24118 Kiel.
    Institut für Psychologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
    Search for articles by this author


      It is argued that attempts at measuring and modeling shared decision making (SDM) could benefit from trying harder to answer basic theoretical questions on the assumed nature of SDM first.
      (As supplied by publisher)


      Es wird argumentiert, dass Versuche, Shared Decision Making (SDM) zu messen und zu modellieren, vom Versuch profitieren können, zunächst einige grundlegende theoretische Fragen zur Natur von SDM zu beantworten.
      (Wie vom Gastherausgeber eingereicht)

      Key words


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        • Kasper J.
        • Légaré F.
        • Scheibler F.
        • Geiger F.
        Turning signals into meaning – ‘Shared decision making’ meets communication theory.
        Health Expectations. 2012; 15: 3-11
        • Geiger F.
        • Kasper J.
        Of blind men and elephants: Suggesting SDM-MASS as a compound measure for shared decision making integrating patient's, physician's and observer's views.
        Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 2012; (this issue)
        • Borsboom D.
        • Mellenbergh G.J.
        • van Heerden J.
        The Theoretical Status of Latent Variables.
        Psychological Review. 2003; 110: 203-219
        • Borsboom D.
        A Tour Guide to the Latent Realm.
        Measurement. 2008; 6: 134-146
        • Borsboom D.
        The Attack of the Psychometricians.
        Psychometrika. 2006; 71: 425-440
        • Bollen K.A.
        • Lennox R.
        Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective.
        Psychological Bulletin. 1991; 110: 305-314
        • Edwards J.R.
        • Bagozzi R.P.
        On the Nature and Direction of Relationships between Constructs and Measures.
        Psychological Methods. 2000; 5: 155-174
        • Jarvis C.B.
        • MacKenzie S.B.
        • Podsakoff P.M.
        A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research.
        J Consumer Research. 2003; 30: 199-218
        • Diamantopoulos A.
        • Winklhofer H.
        Index construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development.
        J Marketing Research. 2001; 38: 269-277
        • MacKenzie S.B.
        • Podsakoff P.M.
        • Jarvis C.B.
        The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions.
        J Applied Psychology. 2005; 90: 710-730