Advertisement
Schwerpunkt| Volume 106, ISSUE 4, P238-246, 2012

Download started.

Ok

Measurement of patient involvement – What do concepts of psychotherapy research contribute?

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
    Bernhard Strauss
    Correspondence
    Korrespondenzadresse. Prof. Dr. Bernhard Strauss, University Hospital Jena, Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Stoystr. 3, D 07740 Jena, Germany. Fon: 49 3641 936700, Fax: +49 3641 936546.
    Footnotes
    1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
    Affiliations
    Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
    Andrea Thomas
    Footnotes
    1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.
    Affiliations
    Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Both authors contributed equally to this work.

      Summary

      The article comments on Shared Decision Making (SDM) research from a different perspective, i.e. psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy research had to face similar challenges, both conceptual as well as methodological. Meanwhile, the generic model of psychotherapy has helped researchers to put single results into a perspective that also might be helpful to the SDM field. Since SDM research increasingly focuses upon process perspectives directed towards the doctor-patient dyad, we propose measures and constructs from interpersonal theory as useful tools to be introduced into SDM research. A selection of these measures and their potential within SDM research is described.

      Zusammenfassung

      Der Beitrag kommentiert SDM-Forschung aus einer anderen Perspektive, nämlich jener der Psychotherapieforschung. Die Psychotherapieforschung sah sich ähnlichen konzeptuellen wie methodischen Herausforderungen gegenüber, wie sie derzeit im Zusammenhang mit SDM diskutiert werden. Mittlerweile hat beispielsweise ein Allgemeines Modell von Psychotherapie („generic model of psychotherapy“) dazu beigetragen, dass Einzelbefunde besser integriert werden können. Ein analoges Modell könnte für die SDM-Forschung hilfreich sein. Da in diesem Bereich der Forschung mehr und mehr auf Prozessaspekte geachtet wird, die auf dyadische Gesichtspunkte fokussieren, werden als nützliche Hilfsmittel hierfür Instrumente und Konstrukte aus der interpersonalen Theorie vorgeschlagen, die vermehrt in die SDM-Forschung integriert werden könnten. Eine Auswahl dieser Methoden und ihr Potenzial im Kontext von SDM werden skizziert.

      Key words

      Schlüsselwörter

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Kriston L.
        • Härter M.
        • Scholl I.
        A latent variable framework for modeling dyadic measures in research on shared decision making.
        Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes (ZEFQ). 2012; 106: 253-263
        • Elwyn G.
        • Edwards A.
        • Wensing M.
        • Hood K.
        • Atwell C.
        • Grol R.
        Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
        Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003 Apr 1; 12: 93-99
        • Nicolai J.
        • Moshagen M.
        • Eich W.
        • Bieber C.
        The OPTION scale for the assessment of shared decision making (SDM): Methodological issues.
        Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes (ZEFQ). 2012; 106: 264-271
        • Kasper J.
        • Hoffmann F.
        • Heesen C.
        • Köpke S.
        • Geiger F.
        Completing the third person's perspective on patients’ involvement in medical decision making - approaching the full picture.
        Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012; 106: 275-283
        • Kasper J.
        • Légaré F.
        • Scheibler F.
        • Geiger F.
        Turning signals into meaning -“Shared decision making” meets communication theory.
        Health Expectations. 2012; 15: 3-11
        • Légaré F.
        • LeBlanc A.
        • Robitaille H.
        • Turcotte S.
        The decision conflict scale: Moving from the individual to the dyad level.
        Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes (ZEFQ). 2012; 106: 247-252
        • Scholl I.
        • Koelewijn-van Loon M.
        • Sepucha K.
        • Elwyn G.
        • Légaré F.
        • Härter M.
        • et al.
        Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.
        Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011; 105: 313-324
        • Orlinsky D.E.
        • Howard K.I.
        Process and Outcome in Psychotherapy.
        in: Garfield S.L. Bergin A.E. Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 3rd ed. J.Wiley, New York1986: 311-381
        • Shepherd H.L.
        • Barratt A.
        • Trevena L.J.
        • McGeechan K.
        • Carey K.
        • Epstein R.M.
        • et al.
        Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep; 84: 379-385
        • Bordin E.S.
        The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance.
        Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1976; 16: 252-260
      1. Norcross J Psychotherapeutic relationships that work. APA, Washington2011
        • Kiesler D.J.
        • Auerbach S.M.
        Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex.
        Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57: 1707-1722
        • Siminoff L.A.
        • Step M.M.
        A communication model of Shared Decision Making: Accounting for cancer treatment decisions.
        Health Psychology. 2005; 24: 99-105
        • O‘Connor A.M.
        • Jacobsen M.J.
        Decisional Conflict: supporting people experiencing uncertainty about options affecting their health.
        Ottawa Health Decision Centre, Ottawa2007 (Available at: https://decisionaid. ohri.ca/ODST/pdfs/DC_Reading.pdf, accessed January 2011)
        • Elwyn G.
        • Edwards A.
        • Kinnersley P.
        • Grol R.
        Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices.
        British Journal of General Practice. 2000; 50: 892-899
      2. Horowitz L.M. Strack S. Handbook of interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment and Therapeutic Interventions. Wiley, NY2011
        • Kiesler D.J.
        Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality.
        psychopathology and psychotherapy. Wiley, NY1996
        • Friedman M.B.
        • Leary T.F.
        • Ossorio A.G.
        • Coffey H.S.
        The interpersonal dimension of personality.
        Journal of Personality. 1951; 20: 143-161
        • Kiesler D.J.
        The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions.
        Psychological Review. 1983; 90: 185-214
        • Leary T.F.
        Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology of personality evaluation.
        Ronald, NY1957
        • Wiggins J.S.
        A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain.
        Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979; 37: 395-412
        • Ostendorf F.
        • Angleitner A.
        Psychometrische Merkmale einer deutschen Version der Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS) von Wiggins.
        Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie. 1998; 19: 44
        • Jacobs I.
        • Scholl W.
        Interpersonale Adjektivliste (IAL). Die empirische Umsetzung theoretischer Circumplex-Eigenschaften für die Messung interpersonaler Stile.
        Diagnostica. 2005; 51: 145-155
        • Horowitz L.M.
        • Strauß B.
        • Kordy H.
        Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-D). Handanweisung (2. Aufl.).
        Beltz Test Gesellschaft, Weinheim2000
        • Thomas A.
        • Brähler E.
        • Strauß B.
        IIP-32: Entwicklung, Validierung und Normierung einer Kurzform des Inventars zur Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme.
        Diagnostica. 2011; 57: 68-83
        • Locke K.D.
        Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders.
        Journal of Personality Assessment. 2000; 75: 249-267
      3. Thomas A, Locke K, Strauß B. Das Inventar zur Erfassung interpersonaler Motive: Entwicklung und Validierung einer deutschsprachigen Version der Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values. Diagnostica 2012, in press.

        • Kiesler D.J.
        • Schmidt J.A.
        The impact message inventory: Form IIA octant scale version.
        Mind Garden, Redwood City, CA1993
        • Caspar F.
        • Fingerle H.
        • Werner M.
        Der IMI (Impact Message Inventory): Ein Instrument zur interpersonalen Fremdbeurteilung.
        Forschungsbericht aus dem Psychologischen Institut der Universität Freiburg. 2000;
        • Lorr M.
        • McNair D.M.
        Expansion of the interpersonal behavior circle.
        Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1965; : 823-830
        • Tracy T.J.G.
        • Schneider P.L.
        An evaluation of the circular structure of the checklist of interpersonal transactions and the checklist of psychotherapy transactions.
        Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1995; 42: 496-507
        • Auerbach S.M.
        • Penberthy A.R.
        • Kiesler D.J.
        Opportunity for control, interpersonal impacts, and adjustment to a long-term invasive health care procedure.
        Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2004; 27: 11-29
        • Kiesler D.J.
        The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions.
        Psychological Review. 1983; 90: 185-214
        • Carson R.C.
        Interaction concepts of personality.
        Aldine, Chicago1969
        • Sadler P.
        • Ethier N.
        • Gunn G.R.
        • Duong D.
        • Woody E.
        Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions.
        Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009; 97: 1005-1020
        • Kiesler D.J.
        • Schmidt J.A.
        • Wagner C.C.
        Formulas for calculating axis, hemisphere and quadrant scores and for calculating dyadic complementarity using the eight scales of the IMI:IIA octant version.
        Unpublished manuscript. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond VA2001
        • Geiger F.
        • Kasper J.
        Of blind men and elephants: Suggesting SDM-MASS as a compound measure for shared decision making integrating patient's, physician's and observer's views.
        Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes (ZEFQ). 2012; 106: 284-289
        • Frantsve L.M.E.
        Effects of enhanced decisional control on patients‘adjustment to and recovery from oral surgery.
        Unpublished doctorial dissertation. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA2002
        • Auerbach S.M.
        • Clore J.N.
        • Kiesler D.J.
        • Orr T.
        • Pegg P.O.
        • Wagner C.C.
        Relation of diabetic patients‘health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients‘metabolic control and satisfaction wih treatment.
        Journal of British Medicine. 2002; 25: 17-31
        • Benjamin L.S.
        Structural analysis of social behavior.
        Psychological Review. 1974; 81: 392-425
        • Schaefer E.S.
        Converging conceptual models for maternal behavior and child behavior.
        in: Glidwell J.C. Parental attitudes and child behavior. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL1961: 124-146
      4. SASB: die strukturale Analyse sozialen Verhaltens; ein Arbeitsbuch für Forschung.
        in: Tress W. Praxis und Weiterbildung in der Psychotherapie. - 1. CIP-Medien, Aufl. - München2002
        • Tress W.
        Die strukturale Analyse sozialen Verhaltens – SASB.
        Asanger, Heidelberg1993
        • Thomas A.
        • Strauß B.
        Diagnostische Methoden nach dem Interpersonalen Modell der Persönlichkeit [Assessment methods related to the interpersonal model of personality].
        Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation. 2008; 1: 255-277